# [tex-live] Re: Missing texc.lpro

Thomas J. Kacvinsky tjk at ams.org
Wed Aug 18 19:37:04 CEST 2004

```On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Tomas G. Rokicki wrote:

> Well, texc.lpro is generated automatically from tex.lpro;
> that's the way it's supposed to work.  So you should only
> need the one.
>

Ah, I see.  Thanks for the clarification, Tom.

> But what are you thinking of doing do the FontNames,
> FontMatrixes, and FontBBoxes?  All this stuff was set up
> the way it was for specific reasons . . . shall we