pragma at wxs.nl
Sun Mar 28 03:17:02 CEST 2004
At 23:20 26/03/2004, Olaf Weber wrote:
>Note that the syntax of environment variables is not determined by the
>OS. It is determined by the interpreter retrieving the variables.
>Where command.com wants %FOO%, bash on the same OS wants $FOO.
exactly, and to make things worse, some os's are case sensitive with
respect to env vars, while others aren't;
> > -expand-path='var(SYSTEXMF)/fonts'
> > that would be upward compatible, wouldn't it?
>Not really, as it turns previously-uninterpreted text into something
>that is interpreted.
yes, but kind of controlled
>Of course, what happens when I run this on an OS where the default
>interpreter has its own ideas on the meaning of 'var(...)'?
then we cook up something so remote from var that no os will see it, like
[we need something SOAP for os's i guess]
PS. I sometimes run into cshell systems, which adds another level of
fuzzyness in attempts to make portable scripts (bat cmd sh csh ... where
will it end)
More information about the tex-live