[tex-live] Re: Re: Re: Aleph versioning
bilotta78 at hotpop.com
Fri Sep 3 12:02:14 CEST 2004
Olaf Weber wrote:
> Hans Hagen writes:
> > Olaf Weber wrote:
> >> Giuseppe Bilotta writes:
> >>> IMO it's more cleaner to have the hyphens in the banner rather than
> >>> in the version_strings.
> >> I'd rather not mess with the e-TeX soucres myself, so I'll contact
> >> Peter about that.
> > Talking about version numbers and revisions, is there a reason why
> > \eTeXrevision has a period in it, like .2
> I'll just note that for e-TeX 2.1 the value was ".1". So likely a
> carryover from that.
> > Hardly useful, that period (well, it means that one can test for
> > \ifnum\eTeXversion\eTeXrevision pt>2.2pt
> > or
> > \ifnum\eTeXrevision pt>.2pt
> > but in that case \eTeXversion could have been 2.2 -)
> Go forth and complain to Peter.
> > A consistent versioning system among etex pdftex aleph etc would make
> > sense
To solve the (in)compatibilities between Omega and e-TeX in the
versioning system, Aleph comes with a whole BUNCH of version
\OmegaVersion returns the string 1.15
\AlephVersion returns the string 0-rc3
\eTeXversion returns the *number* 2
\Omegaversion returns the *number* 1
\Alephversion returns the *number* 0
\eTeXminorversion returns the *number* 1
\Omegaminorversion returns the *number* 15
\Alephminorversion returns the *number* 0
\eTeXrevision returns the string .1
\Omegarevision returns the string .15
\Alephrevision returns the string rc3
Note that this doesn't break backwards compatibility with any
of Omega or e-TeX, so we may want to ask Peter to add
eTeXminorversion to eTeX?
IIRC, it is also consistent with version numbers in pdf-TeX.
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
More information about the tex-live