kohler at cs.ucla.edu
Sat Jun 11 21:30:06 CEST 2005
The good practical effect of the phi-vs.-phi1 change is that people using
"texmital.enc" or "plmi.enc" with otftotfm will get what they expect.
The bad practical effect is that people writing new encoding files will continue
to make the same mistake as "texmital.enc".
Oh well, it's not a big deal.
I've released 2.34. Thanks!
Karl Berry wrote:
> "lcdftools" instead
> Sounds like a good name. Looks like you're right about a - being
> problematic in the name.
> The makefiles will not, however, install glyphlist.txt in a TDS.
> You'll have to do that by hand.
> Sure, that's fine.
> My glyphlist.txt recodes to match the TeX practice, but this feels a
> little iffy.
> I am agnostic on this. Maybe others here have an opinion. Have
> lcdftools users expressed a preference one way or the other? What is
> the practical effect?
> I will release 2.34 with these changes if you approve.
> Go for it. Thanks for the quick response, as usual!
More information about the tex-live