[tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources
dak at gnu.org
Sat Oct 22 09:20:29 CEST 2005
Reinhard Kotucha <reinhard.kotucha at web.de> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <dak at gnu.org> writes:
> > Since they don't actively market them as far as I know, doing so
> > for something which is presumed to be in the open, anyway, might
> > be good PR.
> When Sebastian presented pdftex at Adobe, they had been amazed that
> pdftex can do things they cannot do with their own tools (I suppose
> that Hans Hagen provided some files). This was years ago, but
> meanwhile Thanh provided many microtypographical extensions.
> If things evolve in the future as they did in the past, I suppose
> that pdftex is not good PR for Adobe, it's more likely that they
> regard pdftex as a competitor.
One does not need to mention PDFTeX in that context. But remind me:
just what Adobe tool is replaced or endangered by PDFTeX? Do they
have a general purpose typesetting program?
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
More information about the tex-live