[tex-live] bug in babel latin.ldf
Robin.Fairbairns at cl.cam.ac.uk
Tue Oct 30 21:38:47 CET 2007
Norbert Preining <preining at logic.at> wrote:
> On Di, 30 Okt 2007, Morten Høgholm wrote:
> > >Latest Babel, or is it enough to grab the latest latin.ldf?
> > Johannes updated latin.dtx recently so that should be sufficient I believe.
> Umpf, yes, it is true, with the version from CTAN it does compile
> without errors.
> But please, can we do decent version numbering / date stamps?
> diff OLD/latin.ldf CTAN/latin.ldf:
> (so the - lines are in the OLD one, the + ones in the CTAN version!)
> -%% Copyright 1989-2005 Johannes L. Braams and any individual authors
> +%% Copyright 1989-2000 Johannes L. Braams and any individual authors
> - [2005/11/17 v2.0g Latin support from the babel system]
> + [2007/03/20 v.2.0f Latin support from the babel system]
> Ok the Date is better, but the version is less ...
mea culpa (note the latin...)
i noticed this, and then got distracted by the existence of
language/latin/latin.dtx which is different again. so i've not
discussed it with johannes. will do.
More information about the tex-live