# [tex-live] Hyperref, ntheorem and pagination

Victor Ivrii vivrii at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 07:49:00 CEST 2012

I have not touched certain tex document between hyperref 2012/07/29
v6.82v and 2012/08/03 v6.82y and with the former it worked well but
with the latter

line 32.

! Missing \endcsname inserted.
\bx at A
l.33 \end{proof}

?
! Undefined control sequence.
\in@ #1#2->\begingroup \def \in@@

Example:

important: to get an error use ntheorem rather than amsthm and the
"textfill"  is essential, also it isa important to have memoir (but
probably with different text fill article  breaks)

\documentclass[12pt,letter]{memoir}
\usepackage[amsthm,hyperref]{ntheorem}

\usepackage[english]{babel}

\usepackage{hyperref}

\begin{document}

However one can notice that essentially the same operators were
introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially the same
operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially
the same operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that
essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever one However
one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced
byHowever one can notice that essentially the same operators were
introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially the same
operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that essenHowever
one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced
byHowever one can notice that essentially the same operators were
introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially the same
operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially
the same operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that
essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever one can
notice that essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever
one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced
byHowever one can notice that essentially the same operators were
introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially the same
operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially
the same operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that
essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever one can
notice that essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever
one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced
bytially the same operators were introduced bycan notice that
essentially the same operators were introduced byHoHowever one can
notice that essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever
one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced
byHowever one can notice that essentially the same operators were
introduced bywever one can notice that essentially the same operators
were introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially the same
operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that essentially
the same operators were introduced byHowever one can notice that
essentially the same operators were introduced byHowever one can
notice that essentially the same operators were introduced by

However one can notice that essentially the same operators were introduced by
A.~Calderon-A.~Zygmund and S.~Mihlin as singular integral operators.
Also quantization procedure was introduced first by H.~Weyl, who used
yet
$$1+1=2$$

\begin{proof}
Blah
\end{proof}

\end{document}

--
========================
Victor Ivrii, Professor, Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto
http://www.math.toronto.edu/ivrii